Showing posts with label Barack Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Barack Obama. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 10, 2019

Who believes that President Obama didn't know what his FBI was doing?



The FBI used evidence it knew was questionable to launch and then continue a clandestine investigation into a candidate for President of the United States. They obtained warrants through the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act courts--venues that were created to allow U.S. counterintelligence officials monitor suspected terrorists--to tap the telephones of people who worked for the Donald Trump Campaign. Even when information they developed plainly told them that there was nothing there, they continued to eavesdrop and leak, eavesdrop and leak some more, and so forth and so on until Robert J. Mueller took over in spring 2017. And all this time, then Attorney General Loretta Lynch didn't know about it?

Moreover, what did President Barack Obama know about this unprecedented and potentially explosive investigation into the affairs of Donald Trump? There were lurid, salacious rumors about videotaped nudity, bizarre sex acts that even I blush about. Obama heard about none of this? After all, Obama made his first splash onto the national political stage in part because his opponent in the Illinois U.S. Senate seat withdrew from the race. His opponent bailed out because a media investigation revealed...  allegations of lurid, salacious rumors about videotaped nudity and bizarre sex acts. Who put the Chicago Tribune and WLS-TV onto the scent of a Republican sex scandal?

And whose Department of Justice used sketchy evidence to launch a similarly sex-tinged deep dive into President Trump's campaign?

Obama didn't use the IRS to harass his political opponents, did he? Well...
Strangely enough, the IRS did target organs of the opposition party during the last administration, but the episode has largely faded from public memory without resolution. May 10 marks the fifth anniversary of the revelation that President Obama’s IRS targeted conservative groups for more than two years prior to the 2012 presidential election.

While some of the faces at the IRS have changed, the law that enabled their misuse of power has not. Congress’s failure to address the problem leaves the U.S. democratic process vulnerable to further abuses.

Lois Lerner, the career official at the center of the IRS scandal, retired on full pension after invoking her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination before Congress. John Koskinen, appointed IRS commissioner by Mr. Obama to lead the agency “in difficult times,” served his full term, spending the better part of four years stonewalling congressional requests for information. On his watch, the IRS destroyed evidence subject to subpoena.
And his State Department wouldn't run interference on a former Secretary of State's embarrassing run-in with Congress over tens of thousands of compromised Top Secret emails, would it? Umm...
The development on Capitol Hill came the same day the Associated Press reported the existence of a personal email server traced back to the Chappaqua, New York, home of Clinton. The unusual practice of a cabinet-level official running her own email server would have given Clinton – who is expected to run for president in the 2016 campaign – significant control over limiting access to her message archives.

The practice would also complicate the State Department’s legal responsibilities in finding and turning over official emails in response to any investigations, lawsuits or public records requests. The department would be in the position of accepting Clinton’s assurances she was surrendering everything required that was in her control.

Congress said it learned last summer about Clinton’s use of a private email account to conduct official State Department business during its investigation of the Benghazi attacks on a US mission in which four Americans died.

“It doesn’t matter if the server was in Foggy Bottom, Chappaqua or Bora Bora,” the House speaker, John Boehner, said. “The Benghazi select committee needs to see all of these emails, because the American people deserve all of the facts.”

"I think Michael Horowitz was surprised to learn... and I cannot believe that there is an investigation that would take you inside a presidential campaign and four people who were targeted within that campaign and that doesn't require some kind of supervisory review and initiation beyond simply the inner-reaches of the FBI?"

Too bad you can't impeach a former President. If only to change his 'honorific' from 'Former President' to 'Disgraced ex-President' Barack Hussein Obama.

Friday, October 4, 2019

RealClearPolitics: Donald Trump's approval is about where Barack Obama was at the same time in 2011


Look for yourself. RCP is no shill site for either political party. It is the least tribal site of any out there.

In October 2011, President Barack Obama's approval ratings were... bad. This was despite an adoring media, a solid majority in both houses of Congress and a Republican Party completely intimidated.

In October 2019, President Donald Trump's approval ratings are... bad. But this is because of a very hostile media and a Democrat Party that will apparently stop at nothing to undo his lawful election.

I like to tell my liberal friends that if this Republic could survive eight years of Obama, we'll be just fine with eight years of Trump--probably better.

Click or tap the image below for the full resolution image of the chart.


I say we will probably be better because:
  • Unemployment is about 1/3 of what it was in Obama's 2011.
  • Minority employment rates have never been higher.
  • There have never been more women in the workforce.
  • Federal income taxes are $4,000 less for the median household than 2011.
  • There are more job openings today than there are people seeking work.
  • $1,000 in a 401(k) or managed IRA on election day 2016 is worth $1,400 today.
  • Crude oil, natural gas and motor fuels are trading near historic lows.
  • Median household incomes for the lowest income brackets are at historic highs.
  • Violent crime--tied to economic well-being--is at an all time low.
  • Customs & Border Patrol is stopping and detaining record numbers of illegal immigrants.
But instead of giving Mr. Trump credit for Americans' well being under his Administration, the media is in cahoots with corrupt left-wing politicians in yet another impeachment witch hunt.

You have to wonder where Mr. Trump's approval ratings would be if we had an honest, unbiased news media today.

I didn't vote for Donald Trump in 2016. I supported Rand Paul very early and then fell for the Access Hollywood October Surprise. I was very skeptical of his presidency from the day he was sworn in. 

That said, if you ask me, "are you better off today than you were in 2016?" I would have to say, "Yes!" If you asked me that question in 2011 vis-a-vis 2008, I would have said, "mehh."


Friday, June 1, 2012

If Barack Obama was NCAA President, this is how the playoffs would work

This is how the Division I college football playoffs would work if Barack Hussein Obama was President of the NCAA. Because, you know, it’s not his job to make the most money. His job is to make sure everybody gets a fair shot.

Up until now, the 1% have kept all of the BCS money and championship glory to themselves, while the other 99% do all the dirty work to enrich the 1%. That’s not fair.

So, Barry’s gonna fix it. After all, he’s the only one standing between the BCS fat cats and the pitchforks, right?

The first order of business is decreeing by Executive Order that there shall be an eight team playoff rather than the four team scheme agreed upon by the leaders of the 1%, the college football presidents in Division I. The four team playoff doesn’t give enough people a chance, even though the disadvantaged schools didn’t really play anyone of significance and belong lousy conferences. It’s not their fault that all conferences are not equal in size or competitiveness. All of that size and competitiveness is a function of greed and collusion anyway. Rewarding excellence is not what’s important in this endeavor. Inclusion is important.

The second order of business is to divide the playoff venues fairly. There will be one in the northwest, one in the midwest, one in California and one for Notre Dame. The southeast—winners of the last six BCS championships—just have to understand that it’s not their turn anymore.

Next, The One will appoint a Presidential Playoff Selection Committee, made up of hand-picked experts on college football and how it relates to the important issues of fairness and equality today. Candidates will include Buzz Bissinger, Nancy Pelosi, Whoopi Goldberg and Bill Maher. Frank DeFord will serve as Commissioner Emeritus.

On the Sunday after the conference championships are decided, the committee reveals its choices and seeds the tournament

Here’s the bracket:

imageDespite the fact that Alabama wins the 2012 SEC Championship, LSU is the overall No 1 seed. However, to give Boise State a shot, their first round matchup will be played on the Smurf Turf.

Next is Ohio State. Ohio State travels to the west coast to play California.

The next is Notre Dame. Notre Dame hosts Syracuse beneath Touchdown Jesus in South Bend.

The last of the four first round matchups is the exciting clash of Oregon at Toledo. The fact that the Pac-12 gets two in the tournament is of no significance, even if USC beat them both and the committee chose LSU over Alabama. Remember, this is about who is deserving. Toledo? How can you have a playoff with no MAC Attack? Get real.

We already know how things are going to go.

The Blue Turf confounds The Hat, denying him the opportunity to snack on his favorite delicacy and killing his offensive playcalling genius. Broncos roll.

There’s no way The One lets a team from Berkeley get beaten in the playoffs. Urban Meyer cries again.

Oregon and Toledo battle it out on the frozen Tundra and Oregon wins a close one.

With The Orange up by five with :09 left, the Irish have the ball on Syracuse’s 35 and it’s fourth and four. Everett Golson appears to miss the receiver on a Hail Mary pass as time ticks away. However, after further review, The One decides that the touchdown was deemed passed.

Cal beats Oregon in the second round, while Notre Dame pulls out another miraculous victory against Boise State, with the Broncos meeting the Irish for the National Championship.

It doesn’t really matter who wins that game, does it? It’s not really important whether there’s a winner or a loser so regardless of the outcome, all eight teams get crystal balls.

DeFord then goes off to write a 6,000 word sleeper column explaining how fairness won the day. Buzz Bissinger goes on MSNBC and Current to explain that he really wanted no part in the selection process and that college football should be banned. He confesses that it was he who convinced the committee to screw Alabama and the SEC. Pelosi babbles on about how we just had to play it to see what was in it. Whoopi goes on The View and talks about how much better looking Notre Dame’s tight ends looked.

The One gets to host all eight teams in the White House Rose Garden.

The ordinary college football fan? He’s Hoping for Change.

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook.

Friday, March 16, 2012

Shocking: Obama’s real tournament bracket finally revealed!

Note that he had neither Creighton nor Norfolk State advancing to the round of 32..

However, since Norfolk is one of the 57 states we’re confident that he’ll make a campaign appearance there this summer.

image Helmet tap to Doug Ross.

Saturday, August 6, 2011

He shall henceforth be referred to as President ObAAma

image You can’t spell his name without AA.

From now through the wee hours of Wednesday, November 7, 2012, the President of the United States of America shall be referred to as Barack Hussein ObAAma.

Yesterday, Standard and Poor’s downgraded the debt obligations of the United States of American from the gilt-edge AAA to AA+.

ObAAma is the first President in the history of this great nation to have presided over a downgrade in its debt obligations.

You can’t spend yourself into prosperity. You can’t borrow yourself out of debt. But you can sure as hell trainwreck the greatest economic engine in the history of the planet.

If your name is Barack Hussein ObAAma.

So it is written, so shall it be.

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook.

Thursday, November 4, 2010

Oh My: Obama trails Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney in 2012 hypothetical

image In a new CNN/Opinion Research poll released this morning, President Barack Obama trails the two putative leaders for the GOP 2012 presidential nomination. He trails former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee by 52-44 and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney by 50-45.  Those are troubling numbers so soon into the still fluid 2012 race, because both of the two top GOP hopefuls are already hitting 50% figures.  Against Sarah Palin however, Obama would win 52-44.

You have to dig a little into the CNN.com article to find the numbers, as the piece initially sounds as if Obama’s sitting well for 2012, then starts off the matchup discussions with the numbers versus Palin.


In a possible general election showdown, Obama leads Palin 52-44 percent among all registered voters.

"Looking ahead to 2012, it may be too early to count Barack Obama out, particularly if Sarah Palin is his opponent," said CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. "The former Alaska governor gets a lot of attention, but she is in third place when Republicans are asked to pick a presidential nominee, and in a hypothetical matchup with Obama she is arguably the weakest candidate of the top-tier GOP hopefuls."

In a hypothetical 2012 matchup, Huckabee leads Obama 52-44 percent, while Romney has a 50-45 point advantage, which is within the poll's sampling error. Obama holds a 49-47 percent margin over Gingrich.


The poll, conducted prior to Tuesday’s midterm elections, may have some sampling bias issues.  Of the registered voters sampled, 500 identified themselves as Republican or leaning Republican and 453 as Democrats or leaning Democrat.  That’s probably oversampling Republicans a bit, so the gaudy numbers of Obama vs Huckabee and Obama vs Romney are probably a little too rosy for the GOP. But by the same token, if they are oversampling the GOP, it shows just how steep the hill is for Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich.

And given the sour mood of the electorate just before the election, these results may simply reflect an attitude of “Anybody BUT Barack Obama, EXCEPT Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich.”

We’ll see.  The fluidity of the 2012 candidate pool will start to solidify right after Christmas.

Beaten, unbowed: Nancy Pelosi says Dems lost because they didn’t do enough

image The capacity of the Democrat leadership to persist in their state of utter denial either represents psychosis, or an incredible ability to look straight at the American people and lie through their teeth.  Never was that made more apparent than Nancy Pelosi’s interview with Diane Sawyer yesterday afternoon.

Does she really believe that Tuesday’s historic election sweep was not a strong, clear message for Washington to stop and change course?  Or is she just psychotic?

Both?

Via the Daily Caller:


“Let’s understand the message,” Pelosi told ABC’s Diane Sawyer. “The message was not, ‘I reject the course that you are on.’ The message is it didn’t go fast enough to produce jobs.”

“I believe that Barack Obama will serve eight years as President of the United States,” Pelosi said, citing the “investments that he’s made.”

“Some of them are longer term, because he thinks in a statesman-like way, and that’s why they didn’t get the full impact now.”

But again, no regrets about the health care for all Americans, consumer protections of an historic nature, Wall Street reform, the list goes on,” Pelosi said.

“As to the agenda that we’ve put forth, progress wasn’t fast enough. And that’s really what the challenge is,” she said.

“No regrets. Because we believe we did the right thing,” Pelosi said. “I feel very at peace with how things have proceeded.”

She also blamed money from outside conservative groups for tipping the scales toward a GOP House takeover.


Shorter Democrat party line: “It’s never our fault when we lose elections.  We were doing everything right. It’s just that those mean old Republicans didn’t let us do enough, they distorted our message and brought in all those evil, nasty corporations and foreign money to pay for negative advertising.”

Pelosi’s comments were little different from the President’s, or of Harry Reid. “Um, no. The peasants didn’t really reject our policies or our agenda. They dislike that it wasn’t enough. No, we’re not gonna change a thing.”

Don’t let the arrogance of these statements escape you. Elitists like Obama, Reid and Pelosi are convinced—perhaps psychotically—that you don’t know what’s good for you and that it’s their duty to shove what’s good for you right down your throat.  Yesterday really wasn’t a civil revolt.  To Pelosi and her ilk, this was just a petulant child escaping the clutches of abusive parents and running for it.  To them, as soon as they can get their claws back on the little peasants, they’ll go right back to serving up dishes of tyranny in lethal quantities.  And smile the whole time.

For the incoming majority in the House of Representatives, and for the incoming majorities in most of the statehouses in the country, this is no time for compromise with these people. In fact, there is no room for compromise with these people, because there is no common ground between liberty and tyranny.

Saturday, August 21, 2010

Ahmadinejad, Netanyahu, Obama: Madman, Statesman, Elitist

ahmadinejad1 Today, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the mad leader of a theocratic, anti-semitic regime in Iran will oversee technicians loading the country’s Bushehr nuclear reactor with fissile material, or “fuel.” In approximately one week, the reactor will become operational.

Paul Leventhal of the Nuclear Control Institute says that  the Bushehr reactor could produce a quarter ton of plutonium per year, enough for aboat least 30 nuclear warheads.

Ahmadinejad celebrates.


President_barack_Obama_Israeli_prime_minister_benjamin_Netanyahu_meeting_Washington Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel, considers a number of very difficult options.  A Nuclear armed Iran is not just a threat to the stability and security of the region, but a threat to Israel’s very existence.

Israel has the only military in the region—besides the United States—capable of conducting an attack on Bushehr and destroying the reactor. 

One option is off the table—letting Iran develop nuclear weapons.  Israel has privately and publicly warned that if the world does not act to prevent Iran from developing a military nuclear program, it will. 

Netanyahu deliberates his options.

 

 


Obama-Vacay Barack Hussein Obama.

We might tomorrow be waking to the news of a devastating attack on Bushehr, Iran threatening to ignite Armageddon and 50,000 US troops in Iraq, caught in the middle.

The President of the United States, Leader of the Free World, the One We’ve Been Waiting for…

is taking a vacation at ritzy Martha’s Vineyard,  his sixth such “break” since taking office and his second trip to the ruling class paradise.

 

Gimme some feedback in the comments.

Thursday, August 12, 2010

Americans don't mind royalty. It's the despots we can't stand.

Princess Diana was beloved by almost all Americans.  Queen Elizabeth is a respected figure viewed by Americans with dignity and a certain reverance. Grace Kelly married into Monaco's royal family and remained a cherished American icon until her own tragic car crash.  So it's not like Americans hold a dim or negative view of royalty.  No, it's the despots we can't stand, and the despotic Obama regime's polling numbers show it.  Demonstrating Americans' ill-will towards despots who surround themselves in the trappings of power is the plummeting popularity of... Michelle Obama. 


The number of Americans who have a positive opinion of First Lady Michelle Obama has fallen in the last 16 months, according to the new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll. In April, 2009, 64 percent of those surveyed by the Journal/NBC said they had a positive impression of Mrs. Obama; today, the number is 50 percent. That 50 percent personal approval is just slightly above President Obama's personal approval figure, which stands at 46 percent in the new poll.

The specific survey question asked respondents to rate their feelings about Mrs. Obama "as very positive, somewhat positive, neutral, somewhat negative, or very negative." The first lady's rating, a combination of the very positive and somewhat positive answers, has fallen from 64 percent in April '09 to 55 percent in January 2010 to 50 percent today.


Seriously, has any First Family in recent history been so conspicuous in flaunting its prestige and opulence?  While Democrats are looting the Treasury of the United States to buy the votes of its constituent groups, the Chicago Camelot Couple have taken vacation trips all over the place.  Ol' Barry has taken lots of time to work on his putting skills at Andrews AFB (which has got to irk the officers club there, since they lose their tee times when he decides it's time for the links).  They've held lavish parties, hosting pop and rock stars like Beyonce, Kanye West, Paul McCartney. You and I consider ourselves doing well to get a Black Angus Ribeye on sale for $7.00/lb. That ain't good enough for the Obamas.  They dig the Kobe beef, which costs $700.00/lb.

Americans wouldn't even mind that, if the regime weren't dead set on increasing the power and scope of the federal government and permanently installing a ruling class that would govern this country like the tyrants we kicked off of American shores in 1783.  Again, it's not the royalty thing we have a problem with. It's the despots, and this bunch is growing to be the most obnoxiously despotic regime in history.  All the opulence and excess just makes the pot boil harder.

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Is the "regime of transparency" getting outflanked for $20 billion?

On June 16, 2010, BP PLC and the United States Government announced plans to establish what amounts to a $20 billion slush fund, ostensibly aimed at compensating residents and business interests along the Gulf coast for economic and financial damage caused by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. The White House also appointed Pay Czar Kenneth Feinberg as the fund's administrator, and he immediately took his dog and pony show on the road.

Almost from the beginning, the government has been either confused or silent on the fund's status. In fact, Feinberg told a CNN interviewer that the fund would cover claims arising from the government's deepwater drilling moratorium, only to reverse himself and change the story the very next day.

On August 9, BP announced that it made an "early" $3 billion "deposit" into the fund to show that it's committed to fulfilling its obligation. Waiting nearly two months for the first installment doesn't seem like either the government or BP understands the definition of the term "early," but let's play along.

The real problem here, gentle readers, is that none of the details of the negotiations between the government and BP have seen the light of day. We have seen no contract. We have seen no memorandum of understanding between the two parties. We have not seen even the first set of criteria for establishing claims legitimacy. All we've had is the Kenneth Feinberg Carnival Road Show, with the charismatic and seemingly trustworthy administrator reassuring residents, businesses and local government leaders that it's all gonna be Ok. At least one state attorney general--Troy King of Alabama--smells a rat.

Since the executive branch has no power to compel a private entity to fork over the bucks to fund the kitty, it stands to reason that BP will have great power in establishing the rules by which claims legitimacy deteminations are made. If this is the case, then BP is likely outmaneuvering the boy-king. They let him fist-bump his buddies over shaking down the company for $20 extra-large, but then they use his constitutional inability to compel payment to restrict the boundaries of claims legitimacy. The $20 billion slush fund just becomes a BP-controlled $20 billion savings account.  This idea appeals to me in a way--the government doesn't have a stellar track record in preventing fraud when it comes to claims-paying.  The Dept. of Justice is still prosecuting fraud cases from the Katrina relief, five years after the storm.  While BP might come across as stingy, they're much less likely to pay frivolous or fraudulent claims because it's like, their money.

But again, we don't know anything, because "the most transparent administration in history" has released absolutely nothing.

I frankly believe BP is playing Obama like a cheap Texas fiddle. Bob Dudley cut his governmental relations teeth by doing business with Vladimir Putin and the Russian Mafia Federation. He beat them so badly that he made the company billions, increased its petroleum reserves and was forced to flee Moscow for his safety once Putin's thugs realized the level to which they'd been played.  Outflanking this bunch of amateurs in the White House is child's play.

By the way, look at BP's stock performance since mid-June.

Gimme some feedback in the comments.

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Radical, left wing news media attacks radical, left wing regime for not being radical or left wing enough

This is comedy gold.  In an interview with The Hill, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs expressed some frustration over the fact that the radical, left wing media organizations like MSNBC are criticizing the Obama regime for being, well, not radical or left wing enough.

“I hear these people saying he’s like George Bush. Those people ought to be drug tested,” Gibbs said. “I mean, it’s crazy.”

The press secretary dismissed the “professional left” in terms very similar to those used by their opponents on the ideological right, saying, “They will be satisfied when we have Canadian healthcare and we’ve eliminated the Pentagon. That’s not reality.”

Of those who complain that Obama caved to centrists on issues such as healthcare reform, Gibbs said: “They wouldn’t be satisfied if Dennis Kucinich was president.”

The last thing in the world this regime needs is an attack from its left flank, especially with the southbound Congressional and White House poll numbers. But Gibbsy's petulance is a perfect illustration of the mood in the West Wing these days. It's not nervousness about the upcoming midterm election. It's not even a gnawing little fear. It's abject terror.

In the Glorious Revolution of 1994, an entire generation of Democratic politicians was wiped out, never to be heard from again. It took the Democrats 12 years and a furious onslaught from the radical left wing media to claw back into power. After six years of Democrat congressional majorities and two years of almost uncheckable power, the electorate seems to have seen enough of this bunch and ruling class Democrats know what's in store. What really gets under their skin though is the fact that the grass nutroots that helped them get to where they are have been some of the most vocal critics in recent months.

Pass the popcorn, and gimme some feedback in the comments.

Monday, July 26, 2010

Deepwater Horizon Spill: Winners, Losers & Goats

Now that the oil has finally stopped flowing and NOAA spill trajectory maps showing an ever shrinking slick, it's worth spending some time evaluating the players and organizations involved in the events surrounding the country's worst environmental disaster. I'm picking the winners, the losers, and the goats.

Winners:
Bobby Jindal -- Jindal has seriously polished his credentials as an effective manager throughout this crisis.  He took some early criticism for not fully deploying National Guard troops, but explained that he'd deployed what he thought was needed and as Governor, that was his call since non-federalized National Guard troops are commanded by the state's chief executive.  His message has been consistent from the beginning--the Federal government and BP either need to provide the resources needed by state and local officials to protect their shoreline, or get out of the way.  He's also been a consistent clarion on the damage that the ill-advised drilling moratorium would do to the state, regional and national economy.

Haley Barbour and Bob Riley -- Their states haven't been as hard hit ecologically by the spill, and the economic damage done by the moratorium has less of an impact on Alabama and Mississippi than it does on Louisiana.  But both men have shown themselves to be effective leaders during the crisis.  When the federal government refused to locate the proper booming materials, Governor Riley did it himself.  When given the chance to skewer Barack Obama over the lethargic federal response, Barbour famously quoted Napoleon Bonaparte: "Never interfere with the enemy when he is in the process of destroying himself."  Both men had established credentials in disaster response--Barbour with Katrina and Riley with Ivan and Katrina. Both have shown the benefit of that experience and expertise.

Thad Allen -- I know some people may disagree with this assessment, but overall, Admiral Thad Allen has done an excellent job, given the task, the resources and the political environment he's had to work in.  His (almost) daily briefings are informative.  He always sounds like he knows what he's talking about, regardless of the subject's technical difficulty.  Whether its booming, skimming and beach cleaning activities or complex engineering and physical characteristics of a runaway oil well and malfunctioning mechanical devices, Allen communicates exactly what's going on and why.  That shows a penchant for listening to the people working for him, and making decisions based on the best information he has available.  He has no agenda and since he's already retired, job security is not an issue.

Billy Nungesser -- Perhaps no one at the local level has exemplified the frustration of the little guy better than Plaquemines Parish President Billy Nungesser.  If BP was getting in the way, Nungesser gave them a broadside.  When the federal government was getting in the way, Nungesser let them have it.  Nungesser's parish is probably the hardest hit by the one-two punch of the oil spill and the moratorium.  Fishing and oil & gas are the only two industries of significance in his small parish, and both are staggering.  Nonetheless, Nungesser's leadership has earned him the respect and admiration of the whole country.


US Coast Guard -- The US Coast Guard were the heroes of Katrina, flying thousands of missions and rescuing tens of thousands of stranded Louisianians after the storm. With budget cuts and staffing attrition, the Coast Guard was ill equipped to handle the oil spill.  Rescuing people in marine environments requires the precision use of surface and air craft. But marshaling the resources to fight an environmental disaster requires procurement and logistics capability that are best left to organizations like FEMA. They got mired in a bureaucracy that was none of their own making, and their performance showed it. That said, the men and women aboard the cutters, skimmers, fixed wing and rotary wing aircraft have executed their mission to near perfection.  Despite the hundreds of vessels in the Gulf of Mexico and the thousands of aerial missions in the area, no one has been seriously injured in an accident, and no one has complained about performance--once the resources were deployed.  I know some folks will take issue with ranking the USCG as a winner here, but I really can't fault the Coasties for doing their damnedest with the resources they had.  That kind of can-do mentality is always going to be a winner in my book, even if there are some bumps along the way.

Louisiana Senators Mary Landrieu and David Vitter -- Bipartisanship never looked so good.  While Vitter has been more vocal in his criticism of the response than Landrieu, they have spoken with one voice on the impact of the deepwater drilling moratorium.  Both have rightly denounced it as  job-killing bad policy. Both have also called for expedited sharing of federal revenues from offshore drilling.  Until or unless other coastal states approve drilling in their waters, then there is little reason for the governors and legislators in those states to have any benefit accrue to their citizens from offshore drilling.  If you want to share in the royalties, you have to share in the risk.

Losers:
Ken Salazar -- What a joke.  It was Ken Salazar's Minerals Management Service that approved the original drill and oil spill response plans in June 2009.  It was his MMS that approved a revised version in January 2010 and it was his MMS responsible for safety inspections aboard the ill-fated Deepwater Horizon rig.  But after the explosion and fire that killed 11 men and began the the slow motion disaster of the spill, Salazar has been a rumblin, bumblin' stumblin' fool.  From keeping his "boot on the throat of BP," to "shoving BP out of the way," he's been a nearly non-stop gaffe machine. In drafting Obama's deepwater drilling moratorium, Salazar changed the supporting documentation to make it appear that a panel of experts had peer reviewed and approved the moratorium, when in fact the panel was opposed to it.  And, in response to the Deepwater Horizon incident, Salazar announced that he was rearranging the nameplates in MMS and creating two three separate agencies, only one of which has been named.  It is not unusual for cabinet secretaries to "move on" after a mid-term election in a new administration.  Salazar may be one of the first to go.


Florida Governor Charlie Crist -- His campaign as an Independent a Turncoat candidate for Senator adrift on a doldrum sea, Crist has tried to make himself relevant in the Gulf Coast region, despite the fact that Florida's beaches have gotten off pretty lightly when compared to the coastal areas of Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana. He has flip flopped on the issue of drilling in Florida waters, first opposing it, then supporting it, then opposing it again, all dependent upon the political winds of the time.  Florida's disaster response organization is legendary.  FEMA doesn't even handle debris removal or temporary housing after hurricanes in the state, essentially reimbursing the state for its costs.  So even though the damage in Florida has been relatively light, Florida's excellent response mechanisms have placed little demand on the turncoat. This has let Crist shamelessly politicize the spill by calling a special legislative session to place a drilling ban on the state ballot for the November election.  When the session began last week, the legislature's leadership let it last all of 50 minutes before a motion to adjourn was carried without any debate on the ballot initiative. It was a monumental dud.  A fizzle. Crist still trails Marco Rubio in a three way race, and there's every likelihood that he'll end up third once Democrats rally to their eventual candidate.

Janet Napolitano -- Flat-footed and ill-prepared for any disaster, the oil spill caught the former Arizona governor showing that she has no business heading the Department of Homeland Security, the mammoth federal agency that now includes the Coast Guard.  Napolitano made the rounds of the Sunday talk shows on May 2, the day Obama first visited the Gulf, to declare that the federal government had been on the job "since day one."  It was a pathetic, transparent display of incompetency and an administration that simply had no clue what it had on its hands.  She has since played little official role in the response, with Adm Allen apparently having direct access to the Oval Office.

Goats:
British Petroleum -- A company with a dangerously bad safety record, leasing a drill rig badly in need of maintenance, made decision after decision that ignored engineering discipline and basic safety protocols. From February 2010 until that fateful night of April 20, BP apparently never erred on the side of safety.  The drilling project was behind schedule and costing the company millions each day of delay.  In oil patch parlance, what BP did was called "cutting corners down hole," a practice that almost never turns out well.  Company executives at first refused to acknowledge a spill even existed.  Company spokespeople refused to provide estimates of a spill rate once the Coast Guard determined that crude was flowing.  The company frantically tried silly stopgap procedures, like "top hat," "top kill" and "junk shot," none of which did anything except falsely raise the hopes of the Gulf of Mexico residents.  The company's liability under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 and other statues will likely rise into the hundreds of billions and will be a drag on the company's stock for many years to come.

Tony Hayward -- A well-to-do English gentleman, with the snooty attitude and disregard for the local population to round him out.  While Salazar's slips of the tongue were comedic, Hayward's gaffes were the cause of American fury.  Early during the unfolding crisis, Hayward downplayed the amount of oil relative to the size of the Gulf of Mexico, as if to say, "it's not that bad." In May, as video showed millions of gallons of oil and natural gas spewing into the Gulf, Hayward was quoted as saying "I'd like to have my life back," a statement that enraged those still mourning the loss of 11 men who will never get theirs back.  A few weeks later, with the Gulf still being polluted by his well, Hayward was spotted watching a yacht he owned compete in a sailboat race.  And finally, he appeared in a multi-million ad campaign broadcast across the country, which Americans rejected as a blatant PR shill job.  On July 26, Hayward was quietly canned by BP PLC's board of directors.

Barack Obama -- The Goat in Chief has learned a painful lesson, or so we hope.  You can't campaign your way out of an environmental disaster. Real grownups have to make real decisions, or terrible consequences could occur. The rig exploded and caught fire on April 20.  On April 22, it went down.  Nine days after the accident, the President declared the incident a "spill of national significance" under the OPA of 1990.  Eleven days afterwards, he named his Incident Commander, Admiral Thad Allen, which only then allowed for the procurement and marshaling of spill response resources and assets.  The time wasted between the disaster's genesis and the White House's WTF moment was precious time lost, and it let the worst of the early spill's crude reach Louisiana.  Ensuing snafu's, such as failing to waive the Jones Act and waiting ten weeks to accept foreign assistance revealed an administration with no management acumen whatsoever.  The administration seemed paralyzed, unable to make decisions because frankly, they had no idea what to do.  The image of him squatting on the beach at Grand Isle is perfectly illustrative.

It bears noting that Obama has tallied three vacations since April 20, one to Chicago, one to North Carolina and one to Maine.  He's also managed to tuck in ten rounds of golf in the 90+ days since the incident.  Aloof.  Unattached.  Out of touch.

Rubbing salt into the Gulf Coast's wounds, Obama held his first "hot" press conference in nearly a year on May 27, in which he announced the deepwater drilling moratorium, enraging Gulf Coast residents and raising the ire of even steadfastly supportive Democrats like Mary Landrieu and Charlie Melancon.  His June 16 Oval Office address to the nation--his very first ever--was panned from both the left and the right as a colossal failure.

That speech should likely be the metaphor for the entire White House oil spill response--weak, rambling, ineffective and utterly clueless.

Gimme some feedback in the comments.

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

New government website exposed as a political spin machine

Via CNSNews.com, the regime's brand new website appears to be a handy vehicle for putting a positive spin on the government's response to the disaster.  The original website - www.deepwaterhorizonresponse.com - has been operated jointly by BP and the federal government.  But late last month, the government sought greater control over the content propaganda and last week it launched a new site, www.restorethegulf.gov:



The restorethegulf.gov Web site, launched last week, describes itself as “a one-stop repository for news, data and operational updates related to the administration-wide efforts to stop the BP oil leak.”

But the Web site also touts the administration’s “quick” response to the disaster, stating that the administration has been on the scene “since the moments after the oil rig explosion” and “from the very beginning.”

Regular readers of this blog, and particularly the Deepwater Horizon Incident Timeline page hosted here, should be shaking their heads in disbelief or rolling on the floor in hysterical laughter.  You will recall that El Presidente didn't have a political WTF moment until April 29, when NOAA quintupled its estimates of the oil flow and projected that the oil would be coming ashore in Lousiana by the following weekend.  You will also recall that the regime said Obama would not visit the Gulf Coast, then panicked and reversed course.

He didn't declare this a spill of national significance until nine days after the event, didn't name an Incident Commander until 11 days afterwards, and didn't arrive himself until 12 days afterwards.

From "day one," it was apparent that the federal government was caught flat-footed and ill prepared for such a large event.  That's understandable, since the regime approved horribly flawed drilling and oil spill response plans in June of 2009 and had no idea what was unfolding a mile below the surface.

State and local officials have made an almost daily litany of complaints about the government's response, ranging from obstructionism in blocking protection measures in Louisiana, to the failure to deploy skimming equipment in Mississippi to the confiscation of booming materials in Alabama.

Obama has made four trips to the Gulf Coast since the panic attack in late April.  But he's also had at least six fundraising appearances and played golf nine times since the spill began.  Only El Presidente's most ardent, most partisan and most blindly loyal supporters could argue that Barack Obama's handling of this crisis hasn't been an unmitigated disaster "since day one."

Gimme some feedback in the comments.

Sunday, July 11, 2010

Gulf Coast welcomes a native son home, sorta

I wasn't one of the 35,000 who snapped up tickets for tonight's free concert on the beach in Gulf Shores, and I'll be damned if I'll turn one plug nickel over to a scalper.  So, we'll watch the show live on CMT from the comfort of the family's 4,700 square foot sin palace at Fort Morgan, just 12 miles from the venue.

On the menu are Cheeseburgers in Paradise and ice cold Margaritas.

Though Mobile and the Gulf Coast are proud to call Jimmy Buffett one of our own, a whole bunch of us wish he had stuck to his roots and not "gone Hollywood:"

Buffett, a supporter of President Barack Obama, said the roots of the spill lie with the administration of former President George Bush, which was often criticized for being too cozy with the petroleum industry.

"To me it was more about eight years of bad policy before (Obama) got there that let this happen. It was Dracula running the blood bank in terms of oil and leases," he said. "I think that has more to do with it than how the president reacted to it."

If he says that, or anything like it on stage, he's gonna get the what-for from 35,000 people who have watched this disaster unfold in slow motion.  They've watched while a completely discombobulated federal response has let tens of millions of gallons of oil foul beaches and marshes and toss tens of thousands of people out of work.  We've been outraged by an ill-conceived and fraudulently prepared moratorium on deepwater drilling that has already begun sending rigs to other parts of the world.

The President has reacted by playing golf no fewer than eight times nine times and enjoying three vacations.  He had as many fundraising appearances last week (four) as he's made trips to the Gulf Coast since his WTF moment on April 29. In between, he's sued the state of Arizona for trying to do a job he won't, threw Israel under the bus for defending herself and waited ten weeks before accepting offers of oil spill cleanup assistance from foreign countries.

So ummm, yeah... it really is more about how the President has reacted to it.  As for the flaccid attempt to lay the blame at Bush's feet, maybe our prodigal native son should have a look at the record.  For starters, there wasn't an oil spill on Bush's watch.  At least, not one like this.

And secondly Jimmy, maybe you didn't know that while the mineral rights to drill the Macondo Prospect, abbreviated as MC252, were leased by BP in March, 2008,  mapping of the block was completed in March 2009, and the drilling plan was approved by Obama's MMS in June 2009 by an unlicensed drilling engineer at the agency's New Orleans office.  The semi-submersible rig Mariannas spudded the first well at the site and commenced drilling in October 2009.  The rig was damaged by hurricane Ida in November (click for the source).  Deepwater Horizon took over drilling at the site in February 2010 and, according to this Bloomberg story, almost immediately began experiencing problems with the well. 

Jimmy, you're one of ours so forgiveness is easier to come by, but you need to get your facts straight and get your political feet back in the warm waters of the Gulf.  Maybe the change in latitude will bring about a change in attitude. Either that, or just shut your damned political piehole and play a song or something.

PS: Welcome home and thanks for the concert.  We'll be watching and singing along with everyone else.

Gimme some feedback in the comments.

Friday, July 9, 2010

Michelle Obama to visit the Gulf Coast beach that doesn't have oil on it

How charming!  First Lady Michelle Obama is scheduled to visit the Gulf Coast on Monday, July 12.  The White House made the announcement on Friday afternoon (doc dump?):

First lady Michelle Obama will travel to Panama City Beach, Fla., on Monday to meet with members of the community and discuss the impact of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, the White House announced this afternoon.

The first lady will begin her visit with a briefing by officials and local leaders. She will then speak to the Panama City Beach community at an open event in the early evening, White House officials said.

It remains to be seen if areas farther west will be as blessed as Panama City Beach since well, that's where the oil has been.  Northwest Florida has seen several of its pristine beaches fouled with tarballs, oil mousse and sheen. But for the most part, Panama City Beach has gotten off fairly well. Just a few miles east on US 98, Fort Walton Beach and Destin got hammered pretty hard. Navarre, Pensacola Beach and Gulf Breeze have gotten hit even harder.

Alabama and Mississippi shores have both been fouled as badly or worse than Pensacola, and of course the bulk of the shoreline damage done by spilled crude is on the Louisiana shore, where nearly 300 miles of contiguous shoreline see oil beaching almost daily.  The image below is a screenshot of the JIC's mapping tool, ERMA.  Click it for the full screen version.


Note the legend to the right, showing the latest observations of beached oil. Areas with blue lines along the coast have no beached oil observed.  In fact, there hasn't been oil coming ashore in Panama City for days, and the latest projections of the slick's trajectory through the weekend show the oil will be miles and miles and miles to the west.


You watch, though--when she does her little dog and pony show for the crowd on Monday night, she'll talk about a "devastating impact" she's never even seen.

What a joke.

Gimme some feedback in the comments.

Sarah Palin would have sold out the Folly Theater

In one for the "snicker file,"  Hotline On Call reports that Robin Carnahan had to slash prices to like, below dealer invoice levels in order to fill up the Folly Theater in Kansas City:

Pres. Obama is the best fundraiser the Dem Party has, but his drawing power is way down from its peak during the '08 campaign.

Obama is heading to MO and NV today to raise money for Sec/State Robin Carnahan (D), running for an open Senate seat, and Senate Maj. Leader Harry Reid.

But Carnahan's campaign wasn't able to completely sell out the Folly Theater, where Obama will appear for a grassroots event on Carnahan's behalf, at the prices they wanted. Tickets once priced at $250 are now going for $99, while $35 tickets are half off.

The Folly  Theater seats 1,078, so you'd think it wouldn't be too hard to get a sellout.  After all, it's the POTUS, right?

Alas, the President's rock star status seems to have dimmed somewhat.

I bet there's one rock star who could have sold that sucker out.  Last May, in Wichita, Sarah Palin spoke to almost three times as many people at a fundraiser for an elementary school.  Obama can't get a measly 1,000 to show up at a fundraiser for a candidate for the US Senate, but Mama Grizzly can get three  thousand butts in the seats for a school charity?

LOLZ

Gimme some feedback in the comments.

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Obama ties it off on Arizona lawsuit

Barely one day after his Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the state of Arizona over its new-but-not-yet-enforced immigration law, the Obama White House is already distancing itself from the matter, essentially tying it off and running for the political hills.  Today's Washington Post:

The White House has said the decision to challenge Arizona's immigration law was out of its hands, left completely up to Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. and the lawyers at the Justice Department.

...

Obama will be called upon frequently in the next several months to make the government's case that the Arizona measure unlawfully preempts federal law. As he campaigns for Democrats at town hall meetings around the country, it will be Obama -- not Holder -- who will be at the center of the intense discussion.

A senior Democratic strategist said Obama will probably seek to avoid directly defending the government's suit, or attacking the Arizona law, which remains popular in most polls. Americans largely see the law as an effort to do something about illegal immigration in the wake of federal inaction.

Out of his hands? The Attorney General of the United States, like all other cabinet secretaries, is a political appointee.  He serves at the pleasure of the POTUS and at no point during the conduct of his duties does a member of the cabinet take matters into his own hands or take action that falls outside of the policy agenda dictated by the White House.

The Obama regime wants us to believe that the White House really had nothing to do with this; that the lawsuit was the inevitable result of a careful reading of the Constitution and case law by the crack team of lawyers political hacks at DOJ.  If you believe that, I have slightly leaky oil well in the Gulf of Mexico for sale.  Cheap.

Obama is tying this one off and walking away, strictly for political purposes.  He's leaving Holder out there to dangle, and Holder has already taken intense Congressional heat for a disastrous appearance before the House Judiciary Committee last Spring. Between now and November, any appearances before House or Senate committees will certainly lead to intense scrutiny of  United States v. Brewer, and the political firestorm surrounding the state's action and DOJ's suit is going to torch a lot of Congressional races this fall. 

Obama can try to distance himself from the heat, but it's still his Attorney General, his Department of Justice, and his politically foolish firestorm.

Gimme some feedback in the comments.

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

DOJ's milquetoast lawsuit against Arizona Immigration Law

You heard it in Ecuador first--the United States Department of Justice is today filing a lawsuit against the State of Arizona, asking the District Court of Arizona to rule the state's new immigration law unconstitutional.

As is noted by Jake Tapper, the suit makes no mention of discrimination at all:

The filing makes no assertion that the law is discriminatory or risks being applied in a discriminatory fashion, as the president and other officials said they feared would be the case. Interestingly, this suit makes no civil rights charges against the Arizona law.


Huh? Wasn't the White House all a twitters about how the carefully crafted Arizona statute could mean that it wasn't safe to take your kids out to have ice cream?  Weren't we hearing all about how chilling it would be to let stand a law that let police stop people on the street for no good reason and demand to see their "papers?"  That's not the story now?  Apparently not.

What the suit claims is that the state is attempting to usurp a constitutionally-enumerated power to regulate immigration and establish a policy of naturalization.  But that's not what the state is doing--at all.  The statute merely grants state law enforcement officers the power to determine immigration status during routine police contact and only if a reasonable suspicion exists.  Hypothetically, that condition of reasonable suspicion is satisfied if, for example, a state highway patrolman sees a car full of 20-something men, speeding while driving erratically, on a highway known to law enforcement as a corridor used by drug dealers and human smugglers.

The state doesn't prosecute any offenders under any state statute.  It turns all offenders over to appropriate federal officials so they can do their jobs.

At Hot Air, Ed Morrissey has a little fun with DOJ's tack:

It would be akin to saying that it’s unconstitutional for local police to respond to a bank robbery in progress because robbing an FDIC-insured bank is a federal crime.

The same would go for preventing police from responding to a kidnapping in progress because kidnapping is a federal crime. 

There are numerous federal regulatory frameworks into which states have stepped into to impose tougher regulatory restrictions than the feds do.  Under the Clean Water Act, the federal government establishes regulatory power over discharges made into the coastal and inland waterways of the U.S.  But states such as Florida have taken not only regulatory duties, but investigation, enforcement and punishment as well.  If the federal government reviewed Florida's NPDES program and decided it was too strict or preempted the federal regulatory scheme, would they have a case?  Isn't Florida advancing the federal objective of improving state water quality with tougher restrictions?  More importantly, isn't Florida actually usurping a federal responsibility by investigating and punishing offenders?


What the Arizona case boils down to is the Department of Justice attempting to force the courts to decide a political argument.  The state of Arizona has told the federal government that the laws are not sufficiently enforced to protect the people of the state.  This is precisely what Florida told EPA decades ago when it announced its own NPDES framework.  This is not a dispute that should be settled in a courtroom.  It's one that should be settled in the ballot box, and we have a fine opportunity to get started this November.


Gimme some feedback in the comments.

Federal response exposed as PR sham

White House officials to Plaquemines Parish President Billy Nungesser: "What do we have to do to keep you off TV?!?"

If you've been following this blog and the Timeline page here, this should come as no surprise.  On July 1, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform released a 16-page report contrasting official administration claims on assets deployed and ongoing operations with actual accounts of officials with their boots in the Gulf.

You may remember the "since Day One" garbage claims made by DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano and the equally incompetent boob, Ken Salazar, regarding how they've been on top of this from the get-go.   My own amateur record-keeping in the Timeline page blows that out of the water, and I'm just a little part-time blogger.  How stupid do they think the American public is? 

The House Committee report exposes the entire regime's response to be a complete sham.  Those "more than 140" skimmers deployed near Plaquemines Parish?   Try 30-ish, or so.  Here are some key findings of the report:

Officials on the ground dispute key White House assertions about the number and timeliness of assets deployed in the Gulf. Local officials describe White House outreach efforts as more focused on stopping bad press than on addressing the disaster at hand;

The White House’s assurances that there are adequate resources are at odds with the reality on the ground, where those on the frontline of the spill express significant frustration over the lack of assets. Local complaints are supported by the fact that the White House waited until Day 70 of the oil spill to accept critical offers of international assistance. Local workers and boats could have been assisting more with the clean-up if the Federal government had provided them with needed supplies and equipment;

While the White House has tried to use the delay in finding a visible leak to explain its early silence on the oil spill, Transocean officials and Coast Guard documents from the scene of the oil spill reveal clear and early indications of a substantial oil leak days earlier than White House accounts;

The failure of Administration officials to quickly waive laws preventing necessary foreign assets from reaching the Gulf and other regulations are hampering efforts to clean-up and limit damage from the oil spill. Local officials feel the federal government is making the perfect the enemy of the good in cleanup efforts;

Local officials strongly dispute President Obama’s insistence that the federal government – and not BP – has been in control since day one. One Coast Guard Admiral told congressional investigators that decisions on the ground are made through a “consensus-based” process with BP. In practice, the Federal Government is not in charge of oil spill response efforts through a command-and-control approach;

Local officials strongly believe the President’s call for a drilling moratorium will significantly compound the economic damage caused by the oil spill and will actually increase risk associated with future offshore drilling projects.

You can read the whole report here. You should download it and read it.  It is chock full of money quotes, like the one I led this post with.  The federal response to the Deepwater Horizon Incident makes George W. Bush, Michael Brown and Michael Chertoff look like Einsteins.

Local complaints about federal indifference, federal incompetence and federal interference are all well documented. This, however, is the first official confirmation of federal falsification.  The Obama regime has simply been lying about the number of assets it has deployed in the Gulf, misleading the public about the intensity and breadth of its response.  But what's more onerous is that the lack of a competent and coordinated response to the disaster has amplified its impact.

Gulf Coast tourism is in the tank this season.  Beaches that are normally jammed with tourists are nearly empty.  Restaurants close early.  Entire fleets of charter vessels--some renting for as much as $2,000 a day--are sitting in marinas from Grand Isle to Panama City Beach.  Seafood processors, wholesalers and retailers have zero inventory and customers as far away as Boston and Denver are finding other suppliers.  An entire fleet of shrimp boats, oyster boats and crabbers are laying boom and spotting oil instead of plying their trade on the Gulf.

The regime did not cause this event, but it is certainly guilty of letting it grow into a disaster, and now it looks like the most transparent administration in the history of humankind ever is lying about it and covering up its incompetence.

Hat tips to Weasel Zippers and Doug Powers at Michelle Malkin.

Gimme some feedback in the comments.

Thursday, July 1, 2010

Obama's Deepwater Horizon commission has its objectivity questioned by... Senate Democrats

My what a tangled coalition we weave, when first we practice to deceive.

US Senator Mary Landrieu, D-LA, managed to force the Senate Energy & Natural Resources Committee to form a bipartisan congressional committee to investigate the causes of the deadly Deepwater Horizon explosion, fire and ongoing oil spill in the Gulf.

On the same day the White House commission investigating the Gulf oil spill announced its first meetings -- July 12-13 in New Orleans -- a Senate committee cast what amounted to a no-confidence vote on the commission's objectivity.

The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee voted Wednesday to create a congressional bipartisan commission to investigate the spill, with Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., and others saying a separate panel is needed because the White House commission has four environmental advocates -- three members and the executive staff director -- but no oil industry representation.

The Times-Picayune is being kind in suggesting that the commission's objectivity is in question. As soon as the panel members were named, this blog noted the panel's conflicts of interest. Those people shouldn't even be within spitting distance of a panel charged to investigate engineering and safety failures.  They're long on left-wing policy, short on any real smarts.

Ostensibly, the regime's panel has the task of identifying the root causes of the accident that took down the Deepwater Horizon, and coming up with a regulatory framework designed to prevent such accidents from occurring.  While that panel was to review evidence, conduct investigations and hold hearings, the Department of Interior was to enforce the now-neutered six month deepwater drilling moratorium.  That moratorium was struck down last month by a Federal Judge and remains unenforceable.

But the panel wasn't completed until June 18, and won't hold its first meetings until July.  There was no way the panel could have legitimately and objectively completed its work within the six month timeframe of the moratorium.  So, the question is that, given the regime's selection of panel members and the extremely tight six-month schedule, what was the regime's motive? Hmmmm.

The fact that a Senate committee dominated by Democrats like Maria Cantwell, Byron Dorgan and Bernie Sanders voted to create its own bi-partisan commission is a telling.  When even a staunchly partisan committee like Energy & Natural Resources is doing an end-around the White House, it doesn't speak very well about party harmony.

Congressional Democrats are strategically distancing themselves from the President, as polls continue to show growing public dissatisfaction with his performance in handling the oil spill response.  His overall job performance has been tanking since April and he's quickly turning into poison on the campaign trail.

Gimme some feedback in the comments.