Only one of the seven commissioners, the dean of Harvard's engineering and applied sciences school, has a prominent engineering background -- but it's in optics and physics. Another is an environmental scientist with expertise in coastal areas and the after-effects of oil spills. Both are praised by other scientists.
The five other commissioners are experts in policy and management.
So, we're going to have a bunch of left-wing policy wonks, some of whom have publicly stated their opposition to new drilling, examine the causes of the tragic accident that claimed 11 lives and spilled millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.
Gee... What could go wrong? Whatever do you think this panel's recommendations will be? I have a simple wild-assed guess: It'll look a lot like this.
Beineke and her leftist ilk have no business being within spitting distance of a panel that is charged with investigating an engineering and safety protocol failure. The Deepwater Horizon incident was a failure of individual and corporate adherence to standards that, if followed, would have resulted in the safe penetration and exploitation of one of the Gulf's most prolific oil reservoirs. The panel's job is to find out how and why those protocols were not followed, and make specific recommendations for avoiding such oversights in the future.
Extra Point: Remember, sports fans. This is the panel whose deliberations will determine whether the regime lifts the moratorium on deepwater drilling. Do you have any confidence whatsoever that their deliberations will be based on anything other than ideology? It is a clear conflict of interest, and Republican members of the Legislative Branch need to make a stand on this issue.
Gimme some feedback in the comments.