Showing posts with label Taylor Bean Whitaker. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Taylor Bean Whitaker. Show all posts

Saturday, April 16, 2011

ColonialPalooza: Lee Farkas’ testimony concludes with no smoking gun

image Lee Farkas spent nearly five hours on the stand Friday, defending himself against federal charges that he directed a $1.9 billion scheme to sell phony loans to Colonial Bank, diverted funds out of short-term financing arm Ocala Funding LLC, and defraud the US TARP program.

To our dismay, he did not deliver any smoking gun, directly linking any of the senior managers or directors of Colonial BancGroup to the massive fraud scheme that toppled both the bank and Taylor Bean & Whitaker, the mortgage giant Farkas grew into the largest non-depository lender in the country.

As noted here yesterday, Farkas did testify that the check kiting scheme was authorized by the Montgomery-based bank.


So far, Farkas has claimed that "Plan B", which prosecutors allege was a way to sell Colonial hundreds of millions of dollars in "fake" loans, was the brainchild of Cathie Kissick, the head of Colonial's Orlando-based Mortgage Warehouse Lending Division, whom he first met in the mid-1990s before Taylor Bean exploded into the mortgage lender it became.

"She was very creative in ways to come up with ways for us to fund more loans," he said.

As for the overnight sweeping, which prosecutors claim was funneling money from Taylor Bean's investor funding account into its master account at Colonial, allegedly to help cover operating expenses at the company, Farkas said this all happened under someone else's direction.

"It was someone at Colonial who had authority to make those transactions at the time," he said, adding he sent an internal team from Taylor Bean to "investigate" these overdrafts but never received an explanation that met his level of satisfaction.


He also clearly believed that federal investigators were examining Colonial’s activities during the failed attempt to secure TARP funding, and the prosecution appeared to stipulate that belief by providing jurors with an August 2009 recording of a conversation:


[Sean] Ragland's testimony followed statements from Desiree Brown, Taylor Bean's former treasurer. The jury heard a tape recorded conversation between Brown and Farkas on Aug. 4, 2009, a day after FBI agents raided Taylor Bean's Ocala headquarters and Colonial Bank's Mortgage Warehouse Lending Division in Orlando.

"The only thing they're looking at is Colonial and nothing else," Farkas tells Brown on the recorded call, in reference to the bank's failed efforts to receive TARP funding.


There are about 732 different lines of speculation as to why the prosecution didn’t delve deeper into this relationship and entangle the highest levels of senior management at Colonial, especially after noting that Farkas was allegedly conspiring with a “Senior BancGroup Officer” until nearly the last day before the raids on offices in Florida.

Here’s one line of speculation: Doing so would have provided the Farkas defense an avenue towards establishing reasonable doubt and risking an acquittal.

As to why the defense didn’t take that path on its own… It’s anybody’s guess as to why, on the stand, Farkas didn’t point to Montgomery, Alabama and exclaim “he did it! I’m innocent!” Why not enter testimony and documentary evidence showing the intense and excrutiatingly detailed control the Micromanager exercised over his empire? It appears to be a missed opportunity, and it may result in Farkas’ conviction. Does that mean Bobby Lowder escapes with his skin intact?

Hardly.

In its bankruptcy filings,  Colonial has acknowledged that it is the subject of Dept of Justice criminal probe into to its mortgage warehouse lending division and alleged accounting irregularities. At the minimum, Colonial executives face jeopardy under the Sarbanes – Oxley Act. Colonial’s assets are set to be liquidated in Chapter 11 proceedings in the following months. When that’s done, a ton of documents and other evidence will emerge from behind the shield of attorney-client privilege and the picture will  become much clearer.

Farkas’ defense team sought to speed that emergence process in pre-trial motions to compel access to those documents, but the motion was denied. Perhaps that’s why the Farkas team opted not to raise the matter during trial. It could be fodder for appeal should Farkas be convicted.

Stay tuned. There is still a long way to go.

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook, and visit the Timeline Page for a complete chronology of events.

Friday, April 8, 2011

ColonialPalooza: “I felt powerless to stop it.”

image Former Colonial Senior Vice President Catherine Kissick told jurors yesterday that she felt powerless and had no choice but to continue going along with an ever growing fraud that ended up toppling the largest non-depository mortgage lender in the United States and wrecked the once mighty banking empire founded and run by Auburn University megatrustee, Bobby Lowder.

Kissick was testifying in the the trial of Lee Farkas, former CEO of Taylor Bean & Whitaker. TBW had become Colonial’s largest mortgage lending customer of the financial giant’s warehouse loan business.  Colonial financed billions in mortgages originated by TBW, many worthlessly toxic mortgages that were later packaged and sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. But financial difficulties at TBW were hidden in an elaborate, multimillion dollar check kiting scheme until the banking crisis brought such intense pressure that the scheme was impossible to continue.

Prosecutors also allege that Farkas, working in close concert with a “senior Colonial BancGroup officer” concocted a second scheme to defraud the United States’ Troubled Asset Relief Program out of hundreds of millions. Had the scheme gone undetected, Colonial Bank would have received a massive infusion of capital that may have allowed both firms to survive the crisis. However, federal authorities uncovered the scam, raided TBW and both companies fell into bankruptcy in the summer of 2009.

In another development, the Farkas defense team has won its battle to gain access to documents and email evidence flowing between Colonial and attorneys at Akerman Senterfitt LLP. Via Law360.com (subscription required), Farkas’ attorneys said the needed the evidence to bolster their defense, and that the preparation of Farkas’ defense had been hampered by those documents being placed behind the shield of attorney client privilege.

It’s a win for Farkas and a loss for Colonial and especially for Bobby Lowder, who most believe is the “Senior Colonial BancGroup” official that the government claims Farkas was conspiring with, right up until the day the FBI raided offices, carted off boxes, and padlocked doors.

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook, and visit the Timeline Page for a complete chronology of events.

Monday, March 21, 2011

ColonialPalooza: Lee Farkas to go on trial as scheduled, April 4

image On Friday afternoon, US District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema DENIED defendant Lee Farkas’ motion to delay his trial. The trial date of April 4, 2011 remains in place.

There are no reports in the national or regional news media on this development, so you are reading yet another IBCR scoop!

UPDATE: As of 3:30 CDT, not one of the major news outlets have covered this development. His motion for a continuance was big enough to make Bloomberg, Business Wire and Dow Jones. You’d think that the Court’s decision denying the motion would be important enough to report three days after the order was entered, right?

In his motion requesting the continuance, William Cummings, Farkas’ lead defense counsel, had argued that recent revelations of “potentially exonerating evidence,” and the four recent guilty pleas by alleged co-conspirators required additional time to prepare the defense.

He also argued that evidence he might be able to use at trial remains tied up in the Colonial and Taylor Bean Chapter 11 proceedings and have not been released due to attorney – client privilege.

Those documents, are expected to have a great deal of information on the goings on during Colonial’s final days as a bank holding company.

Judge Brinkema, according to reports, was none too pleased over the speculative nature of the request and entered a terse, one-page order on Friday.

 

image

Four executives tied to the case have already pleaded guilty and are expected to testify against Farkas in the trial. The four—Desiree Brown and Raymond Bowman of Taylor Bean & Whitaker and Catherine Kissick and Teresa Kelly of Colonial Bank—have all entered guilty pleas in the last few weeks.

At Desiree Brown’s plea hearing, Cummings told reporters that Farkas had also been offered a deal by the prosecution, or has at least discussed the possibility of pleading guilty. With Brinkema’s order, his trial will go forward two weeks from today.

The pressure is on.

Exit Question: The Farkas prosecution represents the Department of Justice’s most significant criminal prosecution arising from the 2007-2009 banking crisis. If the government is willing to accept a deal with Farkas, that means there’s an even more significant defendant to be had, doesn’t it?

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook, and visit the Timeline Page for a complete chronology of events.

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

ColonialPalooza: Lee Farkas asks for delay in trial date

lee_farkas_E_20101012153525 Lee Farkas, the former CEO of failed mortgage company Taylor Bean & Whitaker, has filed for a continuance in his federal trial on bank fraud, wire fraud and conspiracy.  TBW filed for bankruptcy in summer 2009 at the height of the banking crisis. That failure led to the seizure of the once-mighty Colonial Bank, which also filed for bankruptcy. The Colonial failure instantly crumbled the financial empire of CEO Bobby Lowder.

The trial is scheduled to begin early next month, but Farkas’ defense team is requesting a continuance until late may or early June. The Court is expected to rule on the motion by Friday of this week.

In court documents released late yesterday, defense lawyer William Cummings accuses the horde of lawyers and accountants involved in the Colonial bankruptcy case of dragging their feet and hiding behind a shield of attorney-client privilege. He believes they hold documents that are critical to his client’s defense and are refusing to produce them.

In a bit of a twist to the case, Cummings also believes that the recent plea agreements reached by two of his former executives and a former executive at Colonial represent “potentially exonerating evidence,” and that the defense team needs additional time to prepare for trial.

Regular readers of IBCR will remember that on February 28, I reported that the deals reached by Desiree Brown and Catherine Kissick were “just the start.” At the hearing in which Ms. Brown copped a plea and agreed to cooperate, Cummings told reporters that Farkas himself was considering a deal for his testimony.

Exit Question: Does Farkas really need more time to prepare for a case that’s been under indictment since June 2010, or does he just need more time to negotiate?

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook, and visit the Timeline Page for a complete chronology of events.

 

Click Here for The Wall Street Journal Bloomberg Businessweek
Grunged post.

See story here.