Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Pearl shucked, but Tressel’s offenses are much more serious

 image On Monday, the University of Tennessee did the right thing in firing men’s basketball Head Coach Bruce Pearl. Pearl admitted to several NCAA rules violations, including improper contact and attempting to mislead NCAA investigators regarding a BBQ held at his home and trying to get others to lie about it as well. As Richard Nixon could have told Pearl, it’s not the crime but the coverup that gets you impeached.

About six hours up I-75 however, an even more serious set of transgressions occurred, when Ohio State’s Jim Tressel learned in January 2010 that five of the Buckeye’s best football players were involved with an improper benefits scandal and said nothing about it.  If the NCAA can prove that Tressel alerted his superiors about the matter and they also participated in the coverup, the consequences from the NCAA Committee on Infractions could be severe.

imageBoth Pearl and Tressel were contrite and apologized profusely in their public statements but so far, Bruce Pearl is the only one of the two to have suffered the worst possible consequences of the Cardinal Sin of lying to the NCAA. Pearl’s transgressions were unforgiveable and UT absolutely did the right thing in terminating the flamboyant, popular coach. It wasn’t easy, either. Pearl had put Tennessee men’s basketball on the map. They were relevant under him and missed the 2010 Final Four by a single point.

But there’s something to keep in mind vis-a-vis Pearl’s poor decision making and that of Jim Tressel.  But for Pearl’s actions, would Tennessee have been less competitive in the basketball games occurring after his transgressions? That answer would have to be an unequivocal “NO.”

That is not the case with Jim Tressel and the Tattoo Five.  Jim Tressel had specific, credible information that as many as five of his best players—including standout QB Terrelle Pryor—were probably ineligible to play after trading memorabilia for tattoos, cash and other gifts. Ask the same question: But for Tressel’s actions (or, inaction in this case), would Ohio State have been less competitive in the football games occurring after his knowledge of the facts?  That answer would have to be an unequivocal “YES.”

Do you think Michigan would like a shot at a team quarterbacked by someone other than Pryor? What about the Arkansas Razorbacks? Would having those five players on the bench made a difference in the outcome of the Sugar Bowl?

Tressel’s team gained a clear competitive advantage by playing ineligible players. Pearl’s teams received virtually no advantage from his actions, and Pearl lost his job.

Tressel should too.

Extra Point: Ohio State went 12-1 in the 2010 season. Tressel absolutely owns Michigan and damned near everyone else in the Big TenlevenTwelve. Tressel is a winning coach. Does tOSU have the “buckeyes” to fire a winner?

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook.

 

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

BingoGate: Supplemental hearing on motions to suppress wiretaps is under way UPDATE: Halted, UPDATE: Rescheduled. Capel PISSED.

image At 9:00 am this morning, US Magistrate Judge Wallace Capel is holding a supplemental hearing on the various motions to suppress the wiretap evidence in USA vs. McGregor et al.

At a hearing last Friday, an exasperated Judge admonished the prosecution over its failure to produce evidence regarding the protocols used by federal agents during the conduct of the electronic surveillance phase of the investigation. The agents tapped the phones of Milton McGregor, Ronald Gilley and others  approximately one year ago.

Those wiretaps produced nearly 13,000 recordings of conversations between McGregor, Gilley, their lobbyists and the legislators they are accused of bribing in a wide ranging conspiracy to gain passage of a constitutional amendment legalizing electronic gambling.

In their motions to suppress the wiretap evidence, the defendants in the case allege that the government exceeded its authority, broke its own rules and violated the constitutional rights of the defendants. As relief, the defendants seek to have all of the wiretaps thrown out.

Should they succeed and should they prevail on appeal, the wiretap recordings and transcripts go into one of those cavernous warehouses, never to be seen or heard ever again. The government’s case will almost certainly disintegrate and the defendants will walk away. Should the Court allow the evidence, the trial will proceed as scheduled on June 6.

Legal analysts providing advice to IBCR expected Capel’s ruling weeks ago, and have expressed the opinion that Capel is carefully considering both the facts and the law.

Updates as they become available.

UPDATE: Capel has halted the hearing because—believe it or not—the government still hasn’t turned over some of the FBI records of wiretaps on the phones of McGregor and Gilley.  Capel indicated the hearing will reconvene later today.

UPDATE II: Capel has rescheduled the hearing until Thursday, angrily chastising the prosecution for failing to comply with his orders. “Those documents better be turned over by the end of the day,” said Capel.

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook, and visit the Timeline Page for a complete chronology of events.

Monday, March 21, 2011

ColonialPalooza: Lee Farkas to go on trial as scheduled, April 4

image On Friday afternoon, US District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema DENIED defendant Lee Farkas’ motion to delay his trial. The trial date of April 4, 2011 remains in place.

There are no reports in the national or regional news media on this development, so you are reading yet another IBCR scoop!

UPDATE: As of 3:30 CDT, not one of the major news outlets have covered this development. His motion for a continuance was big enough to make Bloomberg, Business Wire and Dow Jones. You’d think that the Court’s decision denying the motion would be important enough to report three days after the order was entered, right?

In his motion requesting the continuance, William Cummings, Farkas’ lead defense counsel, had argued that recent revelations of “potentially exonerating evidence,” and the four recent guilty pleas by alleged co-conspirators required additional time to prepare the defense.

He also argued that evidence he might be able to use at trial remains tied up in the Colonial and Taylor Bean Chapter 11 proceedings and have not been released due to attorney – client privilege.

Those documents, are expected to have a great deal of information on the goings on during Colonial’s final days as a bank holding company.

Judge Brinkema, according to reports, was none too pleased over the speculative nature of the request and entered a terse, one-page order on Friday.

 

image

Four executives tied to the case have already pleaded guilty and are expected to testify against Farkas in the trial. The four—Desiree Brown and Raymond Bowman of Taylor Bean & Whitaker and Catherine Kissick and Teresa Kelly of Colonial Bank—have all entered guilty pleas in the last few weeks.

At Desiree Brown’s plea hearing, Cummings told reporters that Farkas had also been offered a deal by the prosecution, or has at least discussed the possibility of pleading guilty. With Brinkema’s order, his trial will go forward two weeks from today.

The pressure is on.

Exit Question: The Farkas prosecution represents the Department of Justice’s most significant criminal prosecution arising from the 2007-2009 banking crisis. If the government is willing to accept a deal with Farkas, that means there’s an even more significant defendant to be had, doesn’t it?

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook, and visit the Timeline Page for a complete chronology of events.

Oil Spill False Alarm

image I woke yesterday to the news that a “massive” new oil slick had been spotted in the Gulf of Mexico, just a few dozen miles away from the site of last year’s Deepwater Horizon rig explosion, fire and ensuing oil spill disaster.

Needless to say, nerves remain on edge and reports of the new spill set alarms off from Lake Charles, Louisiana to Panama City Beach Florida.  Reading some of the news reports, such as this from from NOLA.com, caused me to hold off posting updates. I don’t have a lot of faith in “California-based environmental nonprofit groups, even those with innocuous names like “On Wings of Care.”

As things turned out, I was wise not to fly off the handle and join the hysteria over hyped reports of a 100 mile wide new oil slick. Reports from last night indicate that it’s not an oil spill at all. It’s a bunch of mud from the Mississippi River.

Last Fall, I reported on another California-based nonprofit group, called Project Gulf Impact. PGI reportedly raised a large sum of money through public charitable donations, then abruptly changed their website’s solicitation pages after being alerted that someone was digging into their story. Their website and YouTube pages then carried a slew of scary-sounding stories of poisonings, sickenings and other black helicopter stuff and made the pages of conspiracy theorist websites.

With yesterday’s news of a potential new oil spill, I wondered how long it would take for a “California-based environmental nonprofit group” to fan the flames of controversy and panic, and “On Wings of Care” didn’t disappoint. They were on it within hours. “Like a duck on a June bug,” my grandfather would say.

A solemn anniversary arrives in approximately one month. April 20 marks one year since the Deepwater Horizon suffered a blowout, exploded, caught fire and sank.  Eleven brave men lost their lives in the accident, and millions of gallons of oil were spilled into the Gulf of Mexico. Events like this—manmade disasters of such large proportions—inevitably cause the wackos to come out of the woodwork to sell their stories of woe and take advantage of a fearful, nervous public.

Fortunately, we’re likely not seeing a repeat of last year’s disaster. At least not from the news reports we’re seeing this morning. So will the “California-based environmental nonprofit groups” please get their asses back to the left coast? The Gulf Coast doesn’t need any of your help.

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook.

Click Here for The Wall Street Journal Bloomberg Businessweek

Sunday, March 20, 2011

What was Mark Barron thinking?

News reports early this morning showed that Alabama’s standout Senior Safety Mark Barron was arrested and charged with one misdemeanor count of hindering prosecution. That charge can range anywhere from lying to investigators to sheltering a fugitive.

As it turns out, Barron was charged with lying to a police officer regarding a cousin’s use of his vehicle. From a WKRG News report earlier today:


Someone called 911 about 5:00 a.m. to report an abandoned vehicle on I-10 at Michigan Avenue. When the officer arrived, Barron was with the 2008 Chrysler 300, which had hit the retaining wall. Barron told police a man he only knew as "Bull" had taken his car from Shotgun Willies, a night club in the 4100 block of Government Blvd. But during the investigation, police learned Barron's cousin, Jamal Lang, was actually driving the car at the time of the crash. Lang will be issued a citation for leaving the scene of an accident.

Police say after they learned about Lang's involvement, they gave Barron every opportunity to change his story. The arresting officer says he begged Barron to tell the truth, showed him the law about hindering prosecution and explained he would have to arrest him if Barron continued to cover for his cousin. Police say they even got Barron's mother and grandmother to try and convince him. But Barron refused to admit his cousin was driving the car.


I won’t make light of the case by dismissing this as a stupid decision that led to a misdemeanor arrest. Anytime you are hauled to jail, booked and mugshot and forced to make bail to be released, you’re in trouble.

Mr. Barron appears to have made an incredibly stupid decision, and stuck with that decision even after law enforcement and his own family encouraged him to tell the truth.  I’m sure Coach Nick Saban and the Alabama AD staff will handle this properly.

But if this were my son, I’d have to ask him: “Boy, what the hell were you thinking?”

The Shakespearean Tragedy of Bobby Lowder

If William Shakespeare lived in the modern day state of Alabama, he would certainly be penning one of his greatest masterpieces—the tragedy that has become Bobby Lowder. It’s the tale of a man who rose to greatness and commanded a multi-billion dollar empire. A man who controlled the levers of power at one of the state’s two largest universities. A man who lost his closest, most beloved adviser to an untimely and painful death and a man whose misplaced trust led to the collapse of his empire, all due to a tangled web of fraud, deceit and betrayal.

image For nearly three decades, Lowder built Colonial into a regional, then a national banking and mortgage powerhouse. At the height of its run, the bank was worth more than $26 billion. But on a hot, Alabama summer day in August 2009, federal and state banking regulators seized the banks assets—including somewhere around 350 branches in four states—and turned them over to BB&T.

In June 2010, Lee Farkas, the flamboyant CEO of Taylor Bean & Whitaker, was indicted on 16 counts of wire and bank fraud in connection with the failures of Colonial and Taylor Bean. Earlier this year, four have pleaded guilty to federal charges for their roles in the scheme and have agreed to cooperate with the prosecution. Every serious legal observer of the Farkas and Colonial cases believe that the feds are slowly but surely closing in on their biggest target—Lowder himself. Sometime this summer, the last remaining assets of Colonial will be liquidated in Chapter 11 bankruptcy, and Colonial will be no more.

But all of the documents and evidence relating to Colonial’s final, nefarious dealings will finally see the light of day, no longer enjoying the shield of attorney-client privilege.

In October 2010, Lowder’s close friend, political ally and Colonial boardmenber, Milton McGregor was indicted allong with ten other defendants on charges of bribery, fraud, money laundering, extortion and conspiracy. The key evidence in that case consists of approximately 13,000 recordings of phone calls between McGregor, alleged co-conspirator and Auburn graduate Robert Geddie and other lobbyists and legislators caught in a web of corruption and scandal.

In Jaunary 2011, the federal government revealed in court documents that their investigation had expanded beyond the original scope of the indictments handed down last fall. While there is no knowing who or what the feds are after in the expanded probe, there is more than enough speculation that other individuals with Auburn ties—perhaps even Auburn officials themselves—may be under the intense scrutiny of the FBI.

In November 2010, ESPN and other media outlets revealed that the father of then Auburn star Quarterback Cameron Newton had been shopping his son’s services around during his recruitment in late 2009. He first approached Mississippi State University in November 2009 and asked for “$100,000 to $180,000,” according to news reports. Newton later signed with Auburn University, won the Heisman Trophy and led the team to its first ever BCS National Title.

That title was a rare moment of pride and joy for Bobby Lowder, especially in light of the recent setbacks and tragedies. But will that be like everything else he has seen crumble around him?

THE MICROMANAGER

When the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) placed Auburn on academic probation in 2004, the accrediting organization denounced the “micromanagement” of the school’s day-to-day affairs by the board of trustees, a board dominated by Lowder and his allies and controlled through complicated relationships and business dealings. Another report indicated that former Birmingham Mayor Larry Langford—now serving time in the federal can for bribery and corruption—had a $50,000 loan from Colonial. When the former mayor came up 14 days late on a payment, he was said to have received a call from Bobby Lowder himself. Why does the powerful CEO of a $26 billion bank holding company call a debtor about the status of a loan when it’s not even 30 days past due? 

He does it because that’s what micromanagers do.

In an October 2009 report in Fortune Magazine, former Sun Microsystems president Owen Brown—an Auburn graduate—withdrew a $2 million donation to the school, in protest of Lowder's constant meddling. "I don't think Bobby knows how to debate something logically," he said. "He's either in control or he's down your throat."

When the ESPN story on the Newton recruitment was released, attention was immediately focused on Auburn and whether, after asking for six figures from one school for his son’s services, Cecil Newton allowed his son to enroll at Auburn for nothing. The question of the day: “The price to play at State was one-eighty large, but he went to Auburn for… no extra charge?”

If Auburn did indeed make a financial arrangement for the services of Cam Newton, Bobby Lowder the micromanager would certainly not only be aware of it, he would be in control of it. The NCAA is currently investigating the recruitment of Cam Newton and news reports indicate that the investigation has expanded to involve the recruitment of others in Louisiana, Texas, Arkansas and Georgia.

RELATIONSHIPS, TRAGIC LOSSES AND BETRAYAL

Bobby Lowder has controlled Colonial and Auburn through complex relationships, some professional, some financial, some personal. Before governor Bob Riley replaced Lowder allies with independent Auburn voices with no Lowder ties, virtually ever member of the school’s board of trustees had some kind of relationship with Lowder, usually in ways that would allow him to exert his influence and get things done that he wanted done.

One of Lowder’s most trusted and beloved allies and advisers was the brilliant super lawyer Jack Miller of Miller Hamilton Snider & Odom. Lowder and Miller’s friendship was decades in the making, and Miller served as chief outside counsel for Colonial and at one time had been the company’s vice chairman of the board. He was not only Lowder’s right hand man, he was said to be Lowder’s right brain. But the relationship is somewhat unusual in that most of Lowder’s innermost circle consisted of women. In the Fortune piece, Senior Editor Brian O’Keefe notes:


At Colonial, Lowder surrounded himself with attractive, well-groomed women in high-ranking positions. "One of the great things about working for Bobby Lowder was that he encouraged the females that worked with him to grow within the company," says one former longtime female employee. When he retired, the CFO, COO, and chief credit officer at Colonial were all women.

"I asked him about that once," says another woman who worked closely with Lowder at Colonial. "He said, 'In my experience it's always been men that betray me. Women are more loyal.'" His current wife was once his trusted secretary.


image The irony of this would make Shakespeare tremble. Of the four guilty pleas in the wire, bank and securities fraud cases surrounding the Colonial and TBW failures, three of the defendants to plead out have been women. Desiree Brown, Catherine Kissick and Teresa Kelly are three women with major roles in the alleged fraud scheme. Brown was a TBW employee, but both Kissick and Kelly worked for Lowder at Colonial. Lowder mistakenly believed that these women wouldn’t turn on him, but it appears that they did just that, and they are now singing like canaries to federal investigators.

In July 2009, Jack Miller lost a lengthy, painful battle with cancer and passed away. But Miller’s death was not the only tragedy to befall Bobby Lowder. In recent  years, his 93-year old mother passed away and his bright son—some say the heir apparent to the throne—died suddenly of a brain aneurysm. Such heartbreaking tragedies would make the bard himself weep as he penned Lowder’s anguished soliloquy.

IRONY OF IRONIES

Biographical sketches of Lowder assert that besides his family, the man has had two great loves in his life—the Colonial financial empire and the land grant university in Auburn, Alabama. Those biographical sketches also paint the man as the consummate  micromanager noted earlier. O’Keefe’s Fortune story notes that his microscopic focus extended even to the clothes worn by his colleagues and employees. You dared not show up to a meeting in a cheap suit or attire he deemed poorly chosen. If you did, you heard about it.

In the months before Colonial failed, Lowder and Farkas were alleged to have been working feverishly behind the scenes to concoct what federal securities officials believe was a fraudulent scheme to secure funding from the US’ Troubled Asset Relief Program—TARP. SEC filings in the Farkas case allege that Farkas conspired with a “Senior BancGroup Officer” to conceal their fraudulent scheme to obtain TARP funding. That “Senior BancGroup Officer” is almost certainly Bobby Lowder, CEO and micromanager.

If there is a pay-for-play, improper benefits scheme going on with the Auburn Athletic Department, the micromanager knows all about it and like O’Keefe notes, he is either in control of it or he’s down somebody’s throat. And if the scheme is as broad as many believe it could be, the consequences for Auburn could be devastating.

And therein lies the greatest irony of them all.  Bobby Lowder’s two great loves were Colonial and Auburn. But through constant meddling and micromanaging; by relentlessly interfering with the day to day operations of both, Bobby Lowder may be the reason for their destruction.

Shakespeare would relish penning the story of a man who has everything—wealth, power, prestige, influence—and loses it all through by his own ruthless meddlings. Along the way, he also loses those he loves most and is betrayed by those he trusted most.

This is a tale that would make the bard himself weep.

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook, and visit the Timeline Page for a complete chronology of events.

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Baron Flenory: “I don’t steer players”

image Earlier this week, CBSSports.com’s Bryan Fischer had an interview with New Level Athletic’s Baron Flenory. In that interview, Flenory staunchly defended himself against what he called “character assassination” and “speculation” regarding his Badger Sports Elite 7-on-7 camps and the growing problem of AAU-style influence of 7-on-7 coaches in college football recruiting.

Early last month, Sports Illustrated’s Andy Staples had an in-depth story on the 7-on-7 phenom and explored its impact on the future landscape of football recruiting.

There were several comments in Flenory’s interview with Fischer that I found interesting, but one exchange nearly knocked me for a loop:


Though he denounced the people who tried to take advantage of recruits for profit, Flenory was adamant about continuing to be close to players as a mentor.

"It's not about making a decision for anybody or pushing a kid in a direction, it's about laying down on the table all of the opportunities and sitting down and saying this is one of the best for you," he said. "Whatever that is, you've got to make that decision. I can't live with you for four years. And your $250,000, if that's the going rate, ain't going to last me 40 years and it ain't worth my life."


I called Flenory this week and asked him to clarify this statement. What was he referring to?

“I was referring to the situation down there at Auburn. I don’t know anything about the details of that deal, but that’s not what I’m about. I don’t care what a kid’s ‘asking price’ is,” Flenory told me, “because I’m not there to take advantage of anyone.”

“That’s not what I am and that’s not what my business is about. We’re about giving kids an opportunity to showcase their talent and in some cases, I’m about being the grown-up.”

“But I can’t control what other people do or what other people say. All I can do is help these kids develop and give them an opportunity they may not have had anywhere else. I don’t steer players anywhere.”

Flenory is all business. During the course of a nearly hour-long conversation, he expressed optimism and confidence about his business and insists that he is doing everything above board and transparently. He welcomes NCAA Enforcement scrutiny because he says he’s doing nothing wrong and has always played by the rules. He doesn’t come across to me as anyone other than a small businessman making decisions based on the market and institutional environments he works in. As I wrote in the blog post earlier this week, his story makes sense and it passes the smell test. His 7-on-7 business was growing rapidly and the volume of calls from interested coaches grew too large to handle. He saw a business opportunity in packaging information and selling it, and he took it while staying within NCAA rules. When the NCAA changed the rules, Flenory dropped the recruiting services arm of his enterprise and focused on the core of his business. As long as he played by the rules—at the time the rules were in place—I don’t see where there’s any shady dealings here.

A colleague of mine has a son who has played in New Level Athletics’ system. I also spoke with them this week, and both father and son had nothing but praise for the Badger Sports Elite program and Flenory himself.

Ladies Team GearThat said, the 7-on-7 program’s impact on youth football and college football recruiting is under the scrutiny of the NCAA. The AAU basketball phenomenon has created a nightmare of third party influence and amateurism problems for college basketball, primarily by removing the high school coach from the recruiting process. An elite Division I basketball program now gets more information from a prospect’s AAU coach than he does from the kid’s high school coach. In some cases, a kid might not even play basketball for his high school at all. The AAU system flew under the NCAA’s radar for years and they didn’t realize they had a problem until, well… They had a problem.

That lesson seems to have been well learned and from Staples’ SI piece last month, NCAA Enforcement staff have been attending 7-on-7 tryouts and camps across the country. They don’t want the 7-on-7 system to grow into the nightmare that the AAU travel squads have become in basketball.

In this writer’s humble estimation, men like Baron Flenory aren’t the problem. There are sure to be some individuals who seek to profit from and take advantage of kids, but Flenory vigorously denounces them and says he has nothing to do with them. “I want to make sure there is no misinterpretation. That’s not what I do. I don’t steer players anywhere, and I don’t care what the ‘going rate’ is. I’m not going to risk my business,” he told me.

I believe him.

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook.

Friday, March 18, 2011

BingoGate: Judge reopens wiretap hearing – what could go wrong?

image US Magistrate Judge set another hearing on the admissibility of the wiretap evidence in the bingo bill vote-buying case and reportedly gave the prosecution a tongue-lashing.

Capel—who is widely regarded as a fair and impartial Magistrate Judge—is well known for having a short fuse, especially when the Court’s orders are not being followed.

Such appeared to be the case today, when the defense team alleged that the prosecution had failed to turn over a batch of emails relating to procedures followed during the wiretap phase of the investigation. The prosecution admitted that it had failed to turn over everything, citing a “mistake” in locating everything covered in Capel’s order earlier this month.

At the close of the three day hearing two weeks ago, Capel instructed the government to turn over all of the emailed instructions to agents on how they would conduct the electronic surveillance. The government turned over some, but not all of them, prompting sealed motions to compel by the defense.

An exasperated Capel ordered the hearing to begin Tuesday, and ordered the government to have FBI agents on hand to answer additional questions.

Exit question: Another hearing, three weeks after the first, with no decision yet on evidence admissibility, and a walking grease fire in Brenda Morris still on the prosecution team. What could go wrong?

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook, and visit the Timeline Page for a complete chronology of events.

BingoGate: Closed hearing set for today, judge to hear oral arguments on wiretap motions

image A CLOSED hearing is set for today, March 18, at the federal courthouse in Montgomery, Alabama. Attorneys for Milton McGregor et al and the prosecution will present oral arguments before US Magistrate Judge Wallace Capel.

Since all of the motions filed by the defendants—and the responses filed by the prosecution—are under seal by the Court, the hearing today is closed to the public.

As noted here yesterday, Capel’s decision on the admissibility of the wiretap evidence was expected by many observers as soon as a few days after the three-day open hearing that started February 28. However, Capel gave the parties until the following Monday to file briefs.

The defendants filed a bevy of briefs and arguments, all of which were filed under seal and kept off limits to the public.

Today’s hearing and Capel’s ruling (which could still come at any time), together form a key milestone in this case. If Capel throws out the evidence and the defense prevails on appeal, the case will almost certainly fall apart and no one outside of the prosecution and defense teams will ever learn what those recordings contain. If Capel allows the evidence to be used at trial and the prosecution prevails on appeal, the trial goes forward on June 6.

Stay tuned, sports fans.

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook, and visit the Timeline Page for a complete chronology of events.

 

</P

Solid Gold: “Statement” from Never to Yield

Courtesy of BanditRef, another solid gold original video with a “statement” from the Never to Yield Foundation.

Four minutes of satircal, mocking greatness. If it only weren't so close to the truth.

 

 

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook.